[Lpk-execomm] Motion to endorse Matt Todd

[randall.daniel at lpky.org]

I would favor the post hock method of nomination. easiest to have said 
nomination at the state convention, if we want it in our minutes.

randall

On 2022-11-08 12:07, robert.perry--- via Lpk-execomm wrote:
> Can they blame us?  That is not the concern I am trying to highlight.
> 
> My concern is someone running that we would never endorse and would
> not want to have a L by their name on the ballot.  That is why we need
> to better monitor. In my mind the opposite case of Matt.
> 
>> On Nov 8, 2022, at 10:42 AM, Charles Altendorf 
>> <charles.altendorf at lpky.org> wrote:
>> 
>> I mean if one of our members runs and doesn't tell us.  Can they blame 
>> us for not knowing to nominate them?
>> 
>> On 2022-11-08 06:32, robert.perry--- via Lpk-execomm wrote:
>>> IMO the clearest take away is that we need to be much better at
>>> monitoring who is running as an L.  I'm hoping there is a low cost &
>>> effort way to gather this info for the entire state, but we also need
>>> the information as early in the game as possible.
>>> As for Matt, I suggest we do as little damage as possible, not 
>>> because
>>> some of us like him, but because he has taken local action for us and
>>> enough of us know who he is that timely discussion would have almost
>>> certainly lead to timely nomination.  Would voting on a post-hoc
>>> nomination as an attempt to square what has happened, but otherwise
>>> shutting-up unless asked, do more good than harm ?
>>>> On Nov 8, 2022, at 12:47 AM, LPKY <robert.perry at lpky.org> wrote:
>>>> <image.png>
>>>> Later
>>>> Robert
>>>>> On Nov 8, 2022, at 12:44 AM, randall.daniel at lpky.org wrote:
>>>>> Issue being that I believe that constable is a partisan office and 
>>>>> I don't recall him seeking our nomination.
>>>>> I like Todd, and its too late to correct but its actually 
>>>>> problematic if both are correct.
>>>>> We have a duty to the party to hold candidates to our rules. 
>>>>> legally he's not our candidate if we didn't endorse him and if he 
>>>>> filed as a Libertarian candidate without our endorsement his 
>>>>> filling can be challenged.
>>>>> before I continue these points, Rob do you know if he is the only 
>>>>> candidate filled for the race?
>>>>> And Charles, please tell me D6 endorsed him.
>>>>> Randall
>>>>>> On 2022-11-08 00:33, LPKY via Lpk-execomm wrote:
>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>> From: Robert Perry <rob at rlperry.com>
>>>>>>> Date: November 7, 2022 at 11:39:59 PM EST
>>>>>>> To: lpk-execomm at lists.lpky.org
>>>>>>> Cc: Ken Moellman <ken at moellman.com>
>>>>>>> Subject: Motion to endorse Matt Todd
>>>>>>> Holy Hell!!!  I didn’t realize that Matt Todd was running for 
>>>>>>> constable.  I realize that it is 99% symbolic at this point, but 
>>>>>>> I would like for us to endorse him.
>>>>>>> Matt is a libertarian.
>>>>>>> Matt is VERY pro 2nd, as in he took our 2nd district house 
>>>>>>> candidate shooting and help his campaign by displaying campaign 
>>>>>>> material in his gun shop located in Harrodsburg
>>>>>>> Later
>>>>>>> Robert
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Lpk-execomm mailing list
>>>>>> Lpk-execomm at lists.lpky.org
>>>>>> http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpk-execomm
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lpk-execomm mailing list
>>> Lpk-execomm at lists.lpky.org
>>> http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpk-execomm
>> 
>> --
>> Charles Altendorf
>> Libertarian Party of Kentucky - State Vice Chair
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lpk-execomm mailing list
> Lpk-execomm at lists.lpky.org
> http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpk-execomm