[LPGa Executive Committee] A Resolution to Condemn Red Flag Laws, Demand Accountability for Law Enforcement

Allen Buckley ab at allenbuckleylaw.com
Mon Aug 12 14:51:15 EDT 2019


One more thing:  The whole point of the platform position is protection 
against aggression - not protecting the ability of loonies to mass murder

On 8/12/2019 2:46 PM, Allen Buckley via Lpgaexcomm wrote:
>
> I don't think it directly contradicts, as it is specifically 
> consistent with the rights of private property owners.
>
> When I ran in 2016, a guy from the NRA called me and told me the NRA 
> would have endorsed me had they known about me/my position.  A guy on 
> my campaign team was supposed to get in contact with them, but he 
> failed to do so. (So, they endorsed Johnny.) My campaign position was 
> amendment of the Second Amendment along the lines presented.
>
> I do agree with rejecting legislation that is inconsistent with the 
> Second Amendment (as is the Brady Bill).
>
> To say no changes is simply wrong, and a loser with the public.
>
> I could go along with resolving to reject legislation that is 
> inconsistent with the Second Amendment, while stating the Party is 
> open to changes to the Second Amendment to recognizes changes in 
> conditions since enactment of the Second Amendment, etc.
>
> On 8/12/2019 2:38 PM, Ryan Graham wrote:
>>
>> A resolution backing Allen's proposed Constitutional amendment would 
>> directly contradict our platform:
>>
>>> *1.8 Self-Defense*
>>>
>>> The only legitimate use of force is in defense of individual rights 
>>> — life, liberty, and justly acquired property — against aggression. 
>>> This right inheres in the individual, who may agree to be aided by 
>>> any other individual or group. We affirm the individual right 
>>> recognized by the Second Amendment to keep and bear arms, and oppose 
>>> the prosecution of individuals for exercising their rights of 
>>> self-defense. Private property owners should be free to establish 
>>> their own conditions regarding the presence of personal defense 
>>> weapons on their own property. We oppose all laws at any level of 
>>> government restricting, registering, or monitoring the ownership, 
>>> manufacture, or transfer of firearms or ammunition.
>>>
>> ---
>> In Liberty,
>> Ryan Graham
>> Chair, Libertarian Party of Georgia
>>
>>
>> On 2019-08-12 13:50, Allen Buckley via Lpgaexcomm wrote:
>>
>>> See blue below; glad to see discussion
>>>
>>> On 8/12/2019 1:33 PM, Jay Guidry wrote:
>>>> There are some significant Issues with Allen's language.
>>>>
>>>> A state or Congress may by law require a background check incident 
>>>> to any
>>>> attempted purchase or transfer of a gun, to determine rights.
>>>> 1. So i cant give my best friend i have known for 40 years a 
>>>> ShotGun to go hunting. My wifes friend who fears and Ex Boyfriend 
>>>> we cant loan her a pistol for self defense, I cant leave my Cousin 
>>>> in my house by himself.
>>>>  A state or Congress may by law
>>>> provide for civil liability or criminal punishment with respect to 
>>>> use by any individual other than
>>>> the owner of a gun that causes harm or death to any individual. AB: 
>>>> As to 1 above and 2 below: The point is: If you make your guns 
>>>> available to others, you can potentially be liable if they go out 
>>>> and kill people.  The kid in CT (Sandy Hook) took his parent's 
>>>> guns. The whole point of liability/punishment as provided by law 
>>>> requires legilators to come up with when such provisions should apply.
>>>>
>>>> 2. So i can be held liable for someone use or Miss Use of weapon i 
>>>> am not in control of, IE someone breaks in my house and steals a 
>>>> weapon then shoots up a school i might be held liable? (this is a 
>>>> bad idea)
>>>>
>>>> A state or Congress may by law restrict or prohibit the use of 
>>>> rapid fire guns. AB: Same as above. I would think older people 
>>>> ordinarily should be able to get rapid fire guns, as they are 
>>>> needed to protect themselves. Again, it's up to lawmakers to 
>>>> decide. Perhaps no federal law would exist and states would act as 
>>>> they saw fit. The whole point of permitting state and federal laws 
>>>> is the Feds would likely provide a floor in at least most of the 
>>>> areas noted. Some states might do nothing. Other states, perhaps 
>>>> such as California, would be very restrictive. Open to other 
>>>> language. The point is machine guns, etc. are not needed by the 
>>>> vast majority of the public for protection or hunting, etc.
>>>>
>>>> 3. Outlaw all guns not a revolver or bolt action rifle.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 1:19 PM Allen Buckley via Lpgaexcomm 
>>>> <lpgaexcomm at lists.lpgeorgia.com 
>>>> <mailto:lpgaexcomm at lists.lpgeorgia.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     While I'm in favor of some changes to the Second Amendment, I
>>>>     think they can legally happen only through an amendment to the
>>>>     U.S. Constitution (i.e. a change to the Second Amendment). So,
>>>>     I don't disagree with anything in the resolutions.
>>>>
>>>>     However, I suggest whatever is done leave and be open to a
>>>>     reasonable amendment to the Second Amendment -- simple saying
>>>>     NO to any action doesn't cut it - in my opinion.  Something
>>>>     needs to be done. I don't think the framers would adopt the
>>>>     Second Amendment given's today's reality.
>>>>
>>>>     What I believe is reasonable is attached; other possibilities exist
>>>>
>>>>     On 8/12/2019 11:13 AM, Ryan Graham via Lpgaexcomm wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>     Hey Team,
>>>>>
>>>>>     Elizabeth Melton has put together a resolution for
>>>>>     consideration tonight about Red Flag laws. Please review and
>>>>>     be prepared to discuss and vote for the meeting tonight.
>>>>>
>>>>>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jebszFftjhZwvtIoLwAsnSGTPXeY8sl7rjE33LNrbGA/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     -- 
>>>>>     In Liberty,
>>>>>     Ryan Graham
>>>>>     Chair, Libertarian Party of Georgia
>>>>>
>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>     Lpgaexcomm mailing list
>>>>>     Lpgaexcomm at lists.lpgeorgia.com  <mailto:Lpgaexcomm at lists.lpgeorgia.com>
>>>>>     http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpgaexcomm
>>>>
>>>>     -- 
>>>>     Allen Buckley
>>>>       
>>>>     Law Office of Allen Buckley LLC
>>>>     Suite 750, Building 1
>>>>     2727 Paces Ferry Road
>>>>     Atlanta, GA  30339
>>>>
>>>>     Phone: (678) 981-4689
>>>>     Fax: (855) 243-0006
>>>>
>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>     Lpgaexcomm mailing list
>>>>     Lpgaexcomm at lists.lpgeorgia.com
>>>>     <mailto:Lpgaexcomm at lists.lpgeorgia.com>
>>>>     http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpgaexcomm
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Allen Buckley
>>>   
>>> Law Office of Allen Buckley LLC
>>> Suite 750, Building 1
>>> 2727 Paces Ferry Road
>>> Atlanta, GA  30339
>>>
>>> Phone: (678) 981-4689
>>> Fax: (855) 243-0006
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lpgaexcomm mailing list
>>> Lpgaexcomm at lists.lpgeorgia.com <mailto:Lpgaexcomm at lists.lpgeorgia.com>
>>> http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpgaexcomm
> -- 
> Allen Buckley
>   
> Law Office of Allen Buckley LLC
> Suite 750, Building 1
> 2727 Paces Ferry Road
> Atlanta, GA  30339
>
> Phone: (678) 981-4689
> Fax: (855) 243-0006
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lpgaexcomm mailing list
> Lpgaexcomm at lists.lpgeorgia.com
> http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpgaexcomm

-- 
Allen Buckley
  
Law Office of Allen Buckley LLC
Suite 750, Building 1
2727 Paces Ferry Road
Atlanta, GA  30339

Phone: (678) 981-4689
Fax: (855) 243-0006

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lpmail.lp.org/pipermail/lpgaexcomm/attachments/20190812/adc43bc8/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Lpgaexcomm mailing list