It has come to my attention that the Bylaws Committee will not be using the same level of transparency that the LNC uses for their e-mail discussions. I am well aware that certain committees deal with certain matters that are more sensitive, and require more confidentiality. However, I am not sure why the Bylaws Committee would need a closed format. I would like to hear the rationale for this. Thanks! Whitney Bilyeu Region 7 Representative
Thank you Whitney. I also would like to know under what rule a Bylaws member cannot discuss specific wording, identities of conversants, or simply forwarding the emails to a reflector list. There was no ruling to go into executive session. On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 2:48 PM Whitney Bilyeu <whitneycb76@gmail.com> wrote:
It has come to my attention that the Bylaws Committee will not be using the same level of transparency that the LNC uses for their e-mail discussions.
I am well aware that certain committees deal with certain matters that are more sensitive, and require more confidentiality. However, I am not sure why the Bylaws Committee would need a closed format.
I would like to hear the rationale for this. Thanks!
Whitney Bilyeu Region 7 Representative _______________________________________________ Lnc-business mailing list Lnc-business@hq.lp.org http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
-- *In Liberty,* *Caryn Ann Harlos* Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann. Harlos@LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos@LP.org> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado <http://www.lpcolorado.org> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee A haiku to the Statement of Principles: *We defend your rights* *And oppose the use of force* *Taxation is theft*
participants (2)
-
Caryn Ann Harlos -
Whitney Bilyeu