[Lpk-rules] Operating Rules

[Cristi Kendrick]

Apologies. Can I get clarification on convention notices?

Is there a possibility that District/State Conventions could overlap 
under Wiest's proposal?

On 2/12/19 9:24 AM, Cristi Kendrick via Lpk-rules wrote:
>
> 700.1.2 - Aye for the 2nd (Wiest's language)
> 700.1.2.5/7 - Aye
> 700.1.10 - Aye for the 2nd (Wiest's language)
>
> My vote for Wiest's language is b/c we can't predict the future, and 
> there may be mitigating circumstances. Also, regarding 'events' 3 
> weeks of convention planning is better than 2 (weeks).
>
> On 2/11/19 3:38 PM, chris.wiest--- via Lpk-rules wrote:
>>
>> Folks:
>>
>> I am attaching the Operating Rules draft that we got through Saturday 
>> (in pdf).  The stuff in red was stuff in dispute/contention.  Black 
>> and underlined was items of agreement.
>>
>> I am also attaching a revised constitutional proposal that came out 
>> of our meeting (I think this was unanimous, please confirm).
>>
>> _In term of procedure:_
>>
>> I think if either Mr. Hicks or Mr. Capano would like to vote on the 
>> competing proposals in 500.0 related to dues, they can do so.  Same 
>> with the 500.2 proposal.  And the 600.1.3 related to at-large.  And 
>> 600.5.2.5 related to minutes for committees.
>>
>> I need votes from everyone on the 700.1.2 provisions related to 
>> conventions and scheduling of them. Mr. Moellman’s proposal is first, 
>> and my alternative proposal is second.   If anyone has any 
>> alternatives, those are also in order.
>>
>> Please take a look at the 700.1.2.5/7 language about affiliate 
>> dissolution.  I tweaked Ken’s, and it is red, but I think we are 
>> really close.
>>
>> I need votes on 700.1.10 regarding mandating an agenda, particularly 
>> at affiliate conventions. Mr. Moellman’s is first, my alternative is 
>> second.
>>
>> We need proposals on the following:
>>
>> 1000.1: in kind donations
>>
>> 1000.2: ethics, nepotism, conflicts of interest
>>
>> 1000.3: party records / open records
>>
>> 1000.4: financial controls and party assets
>>
>> 1000.5: default standing convention rules
>>
>> I was going to take a stab this evening, and looked at Ken’s 
>> proposals as well.  We may have agreement on a good bit of it (maybe 
>> 85%), but are likely to have some disagreement on some as well.  If 
>> anyone else has ideas, those are also in order.
>>
>> -Chris
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lpk-rules mailing list
>> Lpk-rules at lists.lpky.org
>> http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpk-rules
> -- 
> Cristi Kendrick
> 4th District, Chair
> Libertarian Party of Kentucky
> 502-457-6765
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lpk-rules mailing list
> Lpk-rules at lists.lpky.org
> http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpk-rules

-- 
Cristi Kendrick
4th District, Chair
Libertarian Party of Kentucky
502-457-6765

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lpmail.lp.org/pipermail/lpk-rules/attachments/20190212/df9d20b0/attachment.html>