I was aware of that Mr Longstreth but I do not believe that mitigates this situation. Why? That is the AFTER scenario. IF the first attempt fails then of course one would go. That does not mitigate a pledge by the chair while presiding to subvert the will of the LNC. Not at all. Many many people who want to force an all online convention will also attend. They are not mutually exclusive nor does it mitigate the extreme bias. On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 7:21 AM Richard Longstreth < richard.longstreth@lp.org> wrote:
Fellow LNC members,
I feel we were presented with an example of only one thing the Chair voted on in that poll, not the full picture. I just found the same voting thread and want to share the other option Mr Sarwarck voted on (attached picture) in which he also says he will be attending and supporting the in person section as well. It is possible to hold both beliefs and I'm not sure this so much falls into bias given full context.
Calls to demonize our chair are just as bad as our chair pushing an agenda. Be fair with each other. I will call out what I see but would hope that I would be presented with the whole story to judge fairly. Yes, Nick should remain impartial, however, by voting for multiple sides, he seems to be maintaining that to a degree.
I still think it best that ALL of us remain neutral on such polling and let the body do as it does if it does. Painting each other or delegates as enemies of the party for disagreeing with your interpretation or viewpoint is very troublesome.
Richard Longstreth Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, HI, KS, MT, NM, OR, UT, WA, WY) Libertarian National Committee richard.longstreth@lp.org 931.538.9300
Sent from my Mobile Device
On Sun, May 10, 2020, 22:04 Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business < lnc-business@hq.lp.org> wrote:
We've been snowed. Simple as that. There is no intent to honor the hard-won compromise, and I am inclined to urge the LNC to take other action as there is zero confidence in what was voted on.
Let me give you all the simple reality here. We are duty bound to consider worst case scenario. We have a bullshit online fiasco and get hit with 51 lawsuits AND no fundraising convention. We are bankrupt. Reality bites. There are already actual party members ready to sue. I think that is terrible, but it is real.
The Adams motion is the route we should have taken. Period. End. That is the ONLY compromise that will stop these games, and I ask everyone where they stand. And if Chair Sarwark tries once again to insinuate "agree with me or I will accept your resignation" don't let anyone face that alone as we allowed Ms. Mattson to. Shame on us.
ONE person has consistently subverted the will of this body. The one person that should never do it. Our chair. Wake up.
* In Liberty,* * Personal Note: I have what is commonly known as Asperger's Syndrome (part of the autism spectrum). This can affect inter-personal communication skills in both personal and electronic arenas. If anyone found anything offensive or overly off-putting (or some other social faux pas) in an actual email, please contact me privately and let me know. *
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 9:43 PM Steven Nekhaila <steven.nekhaila@lp.org> wrote:
If Chairman Sarwark truly wishes to convince the delegation to take action that would go against the motion the body set forward, I would implore him to announce his intentions now and allow Vice Chairman Merced to gavel the convention.
Nick, please divulge your intentions to us.
In Liberty,
Steven Nekhaila Region 2 Representative Libertarian National Committee
Impotentes defendere libertatum non possunt "Those without power cannot defend freedom"
On 2020-05-10 11:35 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
I know the rules Mr. Phillips. Consult me privately if you wish to know.
* In Liberty,* * Personal Note: I have what is commonly known as Asperger's Syndrome (part of the autism spectrum). This can affect inter-personal communication skills in both personal and electronic arenas. If anyone found anything offensive or overly off-putting (or some other social faux pas) in an actual email, please contact me privately and let me know. *
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 9:33 PM <john.phillips@lp.org> wrote:
I am not even dead set against online and I agree this is inappropriate. Yet again.
I find myself regretting both not pursuing my first question harder on Saturday rather than backing off, and my motion to cancel the next meeting.
I honestly find myself wondering what options we have for disciplinary action at this point. Yes I should be more familiar with such rules, but there it is.
John Phillips Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative Cell 217-412-5973
On May 10, 2020 10:17 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business < lnc-business@hq.lp.org> wrote:
Mr. Chair, once again, I implore you to maintain the impartiality required. I am concerned about your public pledge to support making amending the agenda on May 22 to make the entire convention online over the wishes of the LNC.
See attached screenshot for pledge and Mr. Sarwark's name pledging to do so.
It would be more convenient for me to stay silent. Duty demands that I not be.
* In Liberty,* * Personal Note: I have what is commonly known as Asperger's Syndrome (part of the autism spectrum). This can affect inter-personal communication skills in both personal and electronic arenas. If anyone found anything offensive or overly off-putting (or some other social faux pas) in an actual email, please contact me privately and let me know. *
--
* In Liberty,* * Personal Note: I have what is commonly known as Asperger's Syndrome (part of the autism spectrum). This can affect inter-personal communication skills in both personal and electronic arenas. If anyone found anything offensive or overly off-putting (or some other social faux pas) in an actual email, please contact me privately and let me know. *