I would be intrigued to hear how the chair views his participation in that poll as impartial. Knowing that Facebook shows who voters are, I as a policy do not participate in polls that would require some level of impartiality, such as presidential opinion polls leading up to convention. If I can exercise that restraint from my office and on my own Region 1 polls despite some personal thoughts, I would expect that the chair be able to do the same. Having your personal thoughts is fine; violating impartiality is not and does not show that you represent everyone. Richard Longstreth Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, HI, KS, MT, NM, OR, UT, WA, WY) Libertarian National Committee richard.longstreth@lp.org 931.538.9300 Sent from my Mobile Device On Sun, May 10, 2020, 20:25 Erin Adams via Lnc-business < lnc-business@hq.lp.org> wrote:
I saw this as well. I also find it incredibly disturbing. I realize saying so likely won't matter but I can't not say anything because I truly believe it to be incredibly inappropriate
Erin Adams Region 7 alt.
On May 10, 2020 10:17 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business < lnc-business@hq.lp.org> wrote:
Mr. Chair, once again, I implore you to maintain the impartiality required. I am concerned about your public pledge to support making amending the agenda on May 22 to make the entire convention online over the wishes of the LNC.
See attached screenshot for pledge and Mr. Sarwark's name pledging to do so.
It would be more convenient for me to stay silent. Duty demands that I not be.
* In Liberty,* * Personal Note: I have what is commonly known as Asperger's Syndrome (part of the autism spectrum). This can affect inter-personal communication skills in both personal and electronic arenas. If anyone found anything offensive or overly off-putting (or some other social faux pas) in an actual email, please contact me privately and let me know. *