I think the question is to try and resolve the very question of if this JC is legitimate or not with the delegates whether that is by holding another election or reaffirming. I'm not sure but I've heard some of it as well, without an end goal or proposal. Richard Longstreth Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, HI, KS, MT, NM, OR, UT, WA, WY) Libertarian National Committee richard.longstreth@lp.org 931.538.9300 Sent from my Mobile Device On Sat, Mar 14, 2020, 14:46 john.phillips--- via Lnc-business < lnc-business@hq.lp.org> wrote:
I am unsure why it would take a bylaws change?
Could we not just continue the election as unfinished/old business from the last convention?
Not an expert on this as we know, but would seem to be the simplest solution.
John Phillips Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative Cell 217-412-5973
On Mar 14, 2020 2:28 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business < lnc-business@hq.lp.org> wrote:
I keep hearing discussions about how we can fix the JC issue this convention through a suspension of the Rules but the JC is under the Bylaws not the Rules and Bylaws cannot be suspended. Am I missing something here?
* In Liberty,* * Personal Note: I have what is commonly known as Asperger's Syndrome (part of the autism spectrum). This can affect inter-personal communication skills in both personal and electronic arenas. If anyone found anything offensive or overly off-putting (or some other social faux pas) in an actual email, please contact me privately and let me know. *