Reminder, this ballot ends tomorrow. You can view status of who remains to vote here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VntkXkkuQouUiWbt9bnI_TjSMKDiTaDDpvsY... *In Liberty,* * Personal Note: I have what is commonly known as Asperger's Syndrome (part of the autism spectrum). This can affect inter-personal communication skills in both personal and electronic arenas. If anyone found anything offensive or overly off-putting (or some other social faux pas), please contact me privately and let me know. * On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 3:43 PM Caryn Ann Harlos <caryn.ann.harlos@lp.org> wrote:
I am not making one. I am stating an opinion.
*In Liberty,*
* Personal Note: I have what is commonly known as Asperger's Syndrome (part of the autism spectrum). This can affect inter-personal communication skills in both personal and electronic arenas. If anyone found anything offensive or overly off-putting (or some other social faux pas), please contact me privately and let me know. *
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 3:22 PM Nicholas Sarwark via Lnc-business < lnc-business@hq.lp.org> wrote:
Dear Ms. Harlos,
If there is something that leads you to believe you have the authority to make parliamentary rulings without a vote of the body, I'm very interested in reading it.
Yours truly, Nick
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 5:16 PM Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business < lnc-business@hq.lp.org> wrote:
Here are my thoughts and what I intend to do. This motion is not out of order and Ms. Mattson noted correctly a pattern of behaviour. And I fully believe that if we start one on a policy manual change the chair will then try to claim it can't apply to existing contracts though it certainly can. I encourage people to vote on this ballot and on a policy manual change that I am going to workshop with people off list.
If at the end the chair rules this one out of order still, I will appeal the ruling of the chair. It is unfortunate that our chair is making things so tedious but if that is the game we are forced to play, I will do for the good of the Party
*In Liberty,*
* Personal Note: I have what is commonly known as Asperger's Syndrome (part of the autism spectrum). This can affect inter-personal communication skills in both personal and electronic arenas. If anyone found anything offensive or overly off-putting (or some other social faux pas), please contact me privately and let me know. *
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:10 PM john.phillips--- via Lnc-business < lnc-business@hq.lp.org> wrote:
Agreed Ms Adams,
which is what I thought we had been discussing, and admittedly did not check closely when it popped up amongst being bombarded by the latest email form blast.
I would change my vote but I believe it is moot at this point as I understand corrected language is being worked on.
John Phillips Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative Cell 217-412-5973
On Jun 4, 2020 2:31 PM, "erin.adams--- via Lnc-business" < lnc-business@hq.lp.org> wrote:
If a motion like this is going to be moved it should be in my opinion moved as a policy manual change that affects all contracts of a similar nature moving forward. If it's good policy, and I believe that it is, then it should Simply Be Good policy and not a one-time usage clause
Erin Adams Region 7 alt.
On Jun 4, 2020 1:43 PM, Alicia Mattson via Lnc-business < lnc-business@hq.lp.org> wrote:
The chair's attempt to abuse his authority continues, with this attempt to declare anything he dislikes to be "out of order." This motion has been on the list with cosponsors for two days, yet the chair waited until voting was underway to say anything. His ruling is neither correct nor timely, and it's just obstructionism. He will play us all the way to Orlando if we let him, so let's continue the vote.
I vote yes again, just to emphasize my opinion of the chair's attempted ruling.
-Alicia
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 8:35 AM Nicholas Sarwark via Lnc-business < lnc-business@hq.lp.org> wrote:
Dear All,
This motion is out of order.
A vote of the LNC has no legal effect on the provisions of an already executed contract.
A motion to change the Policy Manual would be in order. A motion to rescind the executed contract would be in order. A motion resolving the sense of the LNC that the Chair should not cancel the contract under any circumstance would be in order.
But this motion is not.
Yours truly, Nick
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:32 AM Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business < lnc-business@hq.lp.org> wrote:
We have an electronic mail ballot.
Votes are due to the LNC-Business list by JJune 10, 2020 at 11:59:59 pm Pacific time.
Co-Sponsors: Goldstein, Harlos, Mattson, Phillips
=============================================
Motion: Cancellation or force majeure clauses in the contract with Rosen Shingle
Creek for the 2020 convention in Orlando, FL may only be exercised by a
majority of the entire membership of the LNC.
=============================================
THRESHOLD REQUIRED: Simple Majority
You can keep track of the Secretary's manual tally of votes here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VntkXkkuQouUiWbt9bnI_TjSMKDiTaDDpvsY...
Votes are noted with a link to the actual ballot cast for verification. You can find the time that the manual tally was last updated at the bottom of the sheet.
Please notify me of any discrepancies.
* In Liberty,* * Personal Note: I have what is commonly known as Asperger's Syndrome (part of the autism spectrum). This can affect inter-personal communication skills in both personal and electronic arenas. If anyone found anything offensive or overly off-putting (or some other social faux pas) in an actual email, please contact me privately and let me know.