<div dir="ltr"><div>I don't think that demanding that the officials who would be carrying out these laws refuse to violate their oath is "doing nothing".</div><div><br></div><div>That aside, as I look over the wording of it, the second numbered bullet should correctly read "honor their oath to uphold the Constitution" rather than "uphold their oath to the Constitution".</div><div><br></div><div>Elizabeth<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:32 PM Allen Buckley via Lpgaexcomm <<a href="mailto:lpgaexcomm@lists.lpgeorgia.com">lpgaexcomm@lists.lpgeorgia.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>I guess you didn't get what I said:  Amend the Constitution to
      produce a better system</p>
    <p>As of now, I don't think legislators can do much of anything that
      is constitutional; I think much of what they've done is
      unconstitutional<br>
    </p>
    <p>Again, you're recommendation, no matter how you want to phrase
      it, says do nothing<br>
    </p>
    <p>I'm done<br>
    </p>
    <div class="gmail-m_1423049891359500456moz-cite-prefix">On 8/12/2019 4:25 PM, Laura Williams
      via Lpgaexcomm wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      
      <div dir="ltr">In the face of state acts (legislators et al)
        proposing alleged solutions which violate the Constitution. <br>
        Whether they would materially reduce stranger-shootings is
        entirely irrelevant. The ends never justify the means, which in
        this case is abridging civil liberties. <br>
        "Don't do something immoral and unjustified" is not the same
        statement as "do nothing" or "nothing needs to be done."<br>
        Elizabeth's original resolution says we oppose doing something
        immoral, which state actors are insisting should or must be
        done. <br>
        <br>
        I vote YEA on the original resolution and I'm happy to author an
        article to contextualize the debate, which humanizes the party,
        I think. <br>
        Ultimately, we must stand behind individual liberties and
        against unconstitutional abuses that abridge them.  That's who
        we are.</div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="gmail-m_1423049891359500456mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="gmail-m_1423049891359500456moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
Lpgaexcomm mailing list
<a class="gmail-m_1423049891359500456moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Lpgaexcomm@lists.lpgeorgia.com" target="_blank">Lpgaexcomm@lists.lpgeorgia.com</a>
<a class="gmail-m_1423049891359500456moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpgaexcomm" target="_blank">http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpgaexcomm</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <pre class="gmail-m_1423049891359500456moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Allen Buckley
 
Law Office of Allen Buckley LLC
Suite 750, Building 1
2727 Paces Ferry Road
Atlanta, GA  30339

Phone: (678) 981-4689
Fax: (855) 243-0006</pre>
  </div>

_______________________________________________<br>
Lpgaexcomm mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Lpgaexcomm@lists.lpgeorgia.com" target="_blank">Lpgaexcomm@lists.lpgeorgia.com</a><br>
<a href="http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpgaexcomm" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpgaexcomm</a><br>
</blockquote></div>