<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>The whole point is drawing the line so they cannot commit mass
      murder (or the likelihood of such is substantially diminished),
      while protecting the defense rights of ordinary people - it's not
      getting done effectively now</p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/12/2019 2:52 PM, Ryan Graham
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:5fceee259a27688725f6c0cd17e4331e@lpgeorgia.com">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <p>Loonies committing mass murder are already breaking the law. We
        don't support limiting peaceful individuals rights on behalf of
        people who might use those rights to do harm.</p>
      <div>---<br>
        <div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family:
          monospace"><span style="font-family: georgia, palatino, serif;
            font-size: 12pt;">In Liberty,</span><br>
          <span style="font-family: georgia, palatino, serif; font-size:
            12pt;"> Ryan Graham</span><br>
          <span style="font-family: georgia, palatino, serif; font-size:
            12pt;">Chair, Libertarian Party of Georgia</span></div>
      </div>
      <p><br>
      </p>
      <p>On 2019-08-12 14:51, Allen Buckley via Lpgaexcomm wrote:</p>
      <blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left:
        #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0"><!-- html ignored -->
        <!-- head ignored --><!-- meta ignored -->
        <p>One more thing:  The whole point of the platform position is
          protection against aggression - not protecting the ability of
          loonies to mass murder </p>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/12/2019 2:46 PM, Allen Buckley
          via Lpgaexcomm wrote:</div>
        <blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left:
          #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0">
          <p>I don't think it directly contradicts, as it is
            specifically consistent with the rights of private property
            owners.</p>
          <p>When I ran in 2016, a guy from the NRA called me and told
            me the NRA would have endorsed me had they known about me/my
            position.  A guy on my campaign team was supposed to get in
            contact with them, but he failed to do so. (So, they
            endorsed Johnny.) My campaign position was amendment of the
            Second Amendment along the lines presented.</p>
          <p>I do agree with rejecting legislation that is inconsistent
            with the Second Amendment (as is the Brady Bill). </p>
          <p>To say no changes is simply wrong, and a loser with the
            public.</p>
          <p>I could go along with resolving to reject legislation that
            is inconsistent with the Second Amendment, while stating the
            Party is open to changes to the Second Amendment to
            recognizes changes in conditions since enactment of the
            Second Amendment, etc. </p>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/12/2019 2:38 PM, Ryan Graham
            wrote:</div>
          <blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left:
            #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0">
            <p>A resolution backing Allen's proposed Constitutional
              amendment would directly contradict our platform:</p>
            <blockquote style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff
              2px solid; margin: 0;">
              <p><strong>1.8 Self-Defense</strong></p>
              <p>The only legitimate use of force is in defense of
                individual rights — life, liberty, and justly acquired
                property — against aggression. This right inheres in the
                individual, who may agree to be aided by any other
                individual or group. We affirm the individual right
                recognized by the Second Amendment to keep and bear
                arms, and oppose the prosecution of individuals for
                exercising their rights of self-defense. Private
                property owners should be free to establish their own
                conditions regarding the presence of personal defense
                weapons on their own property. We oppose all laws at any
                level of government restricting, registering, or
                monitoring the ownership, manufacture, or transfer of
                firearms or ammunition.</p>
            </blockquote>
            <div>---<br>
              <div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0;
                font-family: monospace;"><span style="font-family:
                  georgia, palatino, serif; font-size: 12pt;">In
                  Liberty,</span><br>
                <span style="font-family: georgia, palatino, serif;
                  font-size: 12pt;"> Ryan Graham</span><br>
                <span style="font-family: georgia, palatino, serif;
                  font-size: 12pt;">Chair, Libertarian Party of Georgia</span></div>
            </div>
            <p><br>
            </p>
            <p>On 2019-08-12 13:50, Allen Buckley via Lpgaexcomm wrote:</p>
            <blockquote style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff
              2px solid; margin: 0;">
              <p>See blue below; glad to see discussion</p>
              <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/12/2019 1:33 PM, Jay
                Guidry wrote:</div>
              <blockquote style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff
                2px solid; margin: 0;">
                <div dir="ltr">There are some significant Issues with
                  Allen's language.<br>
                  <br>
                  A state or Congress may by law require a background
                  check incident to any<br>
                  attempted purchase or transfer of a gun, to determine
                  rights.
                  <div> </div>
                  <div>1. So i cant give my best friend i have known for
                    40 years a ShotGun to go hunting. My wifes friend
                    who fears and Ex Boyfriend we cant loan her a pistol
                    for self defense, I cant leave my Cousin in my house
                    by himself.</div>
                  <div> </div>
                  <div> </div>
                  <div> A state or Congress may by law<br>
                    provide for civil liability or criminal punishment
                    with respect to use by any individual other than<br>
                    the owner of a gun that causes harm or death to any
                    individual.   <span style="color: #000099;">AB: As
                      to 1 above and 2 below: The point is: If you make
                      your guns available to others, you can potentially
                      be liable if they go out and kill people.  The kid
                      in CT (Sandy Hook) took his parent's guns. The
                      whole point of liability/punishment as provided by
                      law requires legilators to come up with when such
                      provisions should apply</span>. <br>
                    <br>
                    2. So i can be held liable for someone use or Miss
                    Use of weapon i am not in control of, IE someone
                    breaks in my house and steals a weapon then shoots
                    up a school i might be held liable? (this is a bad
                    idea)<br>
                    <br>
                    A state or Congress may by law restrict or prohibit
                    the use of rapid fire guns.  <span style="color:
                      #000099;">AB:  Same as above. I would think older
                      people ordinarily should be able to get rapid fire
                      guns, as they are needed to protect themselves.
                      Again, it's up to lawmakers to decide. Perhaps no
                      federal law would exist and states would act as
                      they saw fit. The whole point of permitting state
                      and federal laws is the Feds would likely provide
                      a floor in at least most of the areas noted. Some
                      states might do nothing. Other states, perhaps
                      such as California, would be very restrictive.
                      Open to other language. The point is machine guns,
                      etc. are not needed by the vast majority of the
                      public for protection or hunting, etc. </span><br>
                    <br>
                    3. Outlaw all guns not a revolver or bolt action
                    rifle.<br>
                    <br>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <br>
                <div class="gmail_quote">
                  <div class="gmail_attr" dir="ltr">On Mon, Aug 12, 2019
                    at 1:19 PM Allen Buckley via Lpgaexcomm <<a
                      href="mailto:lpgaexcomm@lists.lpgeorgia.com"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">lpgaexcomm@lists.lpgeorgia.com</a>>
                    wrote:</div>
                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px
                    0px 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #cccccc;
                    padding-left: 1ex;">
                    <div>
                      <p>While I'm in favor of some changes to the
                        Second Amendment, I think they can legally
                        happen only through an amendment to the U.S.
                        Constitution (i.e. a change to the Second
                        Amendment). So, I don't disagree with anything
                        in the resolutions.</p>
                      <p>However, I suggest whatever is done leave and
                        be open to a reasonable amendment to the Second
                        Amendment -- simple saying NO to any action
                        doesn't cut it - in my opinion.  Something needs
                        to be done. I don't think the framers would
                        adopt the Second Amendment given's today's
                        reality.</p>
                      <p>What I believe is reasonable is attached; other
                        possibilities exist</p>
                      <div
                        class="gmail-m_-7312159742590794838moz-cite-prefix">On
                        8/12/2019 11:13 AM, Ryan Graham via Lpgaexcomm
                        wrote:</div>
                      <blockquote style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left:
                        #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0;">
                        <p>Hey Team,</p>
                        <p>Elizabeth Melton has put together a
                          resolution for consideration tonight about Red
                          Flag laws. Please review and be prepared to
                          discuss and vote for the meeting tonight.</p>
                        <p><a
href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jebszFftjhZwvtIoLwAsnSGTPXeY8sl7rjE33LNrbGA/edit?usp=sharing"
                            moz-do-not-send="true">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jebszFftjhZwvtIoLwAsnSGTPXeY8sl7rjE33LNrbGA/edit?usp=sharing</a> </p>
                        <div>-- <br>
                          <div class="gmail-m_-7312159742590794838pre"
                            style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;
                            font-family: monospace;"><span
                              style="font-family:
                              georgia,palatino,serif; font-size: 12pt;">In
                              Liberty,</span><br>
                            <span style="font-family:
                              georgia,palatino,serif; font-size: 12pt;">
                              Ryan Graham</span><br>
                            <span style="font-family:
                              georgia,palatino,serif; font-size: 12pt;">Chair,
                              Libertarian Party of Georgia</span></div>
                        </div>
                        <br>
                        <fieldset
                          class="gmail-m_-7312159742590794838mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
                        <pre class="gmail-m_-7312159742590794838moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
Lpgaexcomm mailing list
<a class="gmail-m_-7312159742590794838moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Lpgaexcomm@lists.lpgeorgia.com" moz-do-not-send="true">Lpgaexcomm@lists.lpgeorgia.com</a>
<a class="gmail-m_-7312159742590794838moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpgaexcomm" moz-do-not-send="true">http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpgaexcomm</a>
</pre>
                      </blockquote>
                      <pre class="gmail-m_-7312159742590794838moz-signature">-- 
Allen Buckley
 
Law Office of Allen Buckley LLC
Suite 750, Building 1
2727 Paces Ferry Road
Atlanta, GA  30339

Phone: (678) 981-4689
Fax: (855) 243-0006</pre>
                    </div>
                    _______________________________________________<br>
                    Lpgaexcomm mailing list<br>
                    <a href="mailto:Lpgaexcomm@lists.lpgeorgia.com"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">Lpgaexcomm@lists.lpgeorgia.com</a><br>
                    <a
                      href="http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpgaexcomm"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpgaexcomm</a></blockquote>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
              <pre class="moz-signature">-- 
Allen Buckley
 
Law Office of Allen Buckley LLC
Suite 750, Building 1
2727 Paces Ferry Road
Atlanta, GA  30339

Phone: (678) 981-4689
Fax: (855) 243-0006</pre>
              <br>
              <div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0;
                font-family: monospace;">_______________________________________________<br>
                Lpgaexcomm mailing list<br>
                <a href="mailto:Lpgaexcomm@lists.lpgeorgia.com"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">Lpgaexcomm@lists.lpgeorgia.com</a><br>
                <a
                  href="http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpgaexcomm"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpgaexcomm</a></div>
            </blockquote>
          </blockquote>
          <pre class="moz-signature">-- 
Allen Buckley
 
Law Office of Allen Buckley LLC
Suite 750, Building 1
2727 Paces Ferry Road
Atlanta, GA  30339

Phone: (678) 981-4689
Fax: (855) 243-0006</pre>
          <br>
          <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
          <pre class="moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
Lpgaexcomm mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Lpgaexcomm@lists.lpgeorgia.com" moz-do-not-send="true">Lpgaexcomm@lists.lpgeorgia.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpgaexcomm" moz-do-not-send="true">http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpgaexcomm</a>
</pre>
        </blockquote>
        <pre class="moz-signature">-- 
Allen Buckley
 
Law Office of Allen Buckley LLC
Suite 750, Building 1
2727 Paces Ferry Road
Atlanta, GA  30339

Phone: (678) 981-4689
Fax: (855) 243-0006</pre>
        <!-- html ignored --><br>
        <div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family:
          monospace">_______________________________________________<br>
          Lpgaexcomm mailing list<br>
          <a href="mailto:Lpgaexcomm@lists.lpgeorgia.com"
            moz-do-not-send="true">Lpgaexcomm@lists.lpgeorgia.com</a><br>
          <a
            href="http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpgaexcomm"
            moz-do-not-send="true">http://lpmail.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpgaexcomm</a></div>
      </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Allen Buckley
 
Law Office of Allen Buckley LLC
Suite 750, Building 1
2727 Paces Ferry Road
Atlanta, GA  30339

Phone: (678) 981-4689
Fax: (855) 243-0006</pre>
  </body>
</html>